Based on this information, write a new short title in English: The Assembly has completed today’s work.

UBP Pier Deputy Emrah Yeşilırmak’s immunity was not removed and the prosecution of the judiciary of the trial of the title of the postponement of the title of the postponement of the committee report was accepted by the majority of vote in the General Assembly. 27 acceptance, 20 rejection votes were used, 3 deputies did not participate in the vote.

The General Assembly of the Assembly, approval and information after the presentation of the UBP Scaffolder Deputy Emrah Yeşilırmak’s request to remove the legislative immunity of the special committee on the subject of the report was discussed. After the meeting, voting was held.

The General Assembly later discussed the Political Parties (Amendment) Law proposal. Following the reading of the committee report, the article article was voted and the second interview was completed. The third interview of the proposal that foresees a regulation on the financial audit of political parties was left to the next combination as it was not urgent.

The General Assembly of the Republican Assembly completed its current work after the vote. The next combination will be held tomorrow at 10.00 with the audit agenda.

-Talan

UBP Pier Deputy Emrah Yeşilırmak’s immunity to remove the proposal to examine the first word in the meeting about the report CTP deputy Ongun Talat. Talat said that it was sad that the rejection of the request to remove the immunity of Yeşilırmak with a majority vote was the first meeting of the new parliament.

Despite the decision of confidentiality, some MPs are not right to make statements on the subject of the public, Talat noted that the reasons for the report, the committee criticized the statements exceeding the limits of authority. Talat read examples from the statements criticized by the report.

The report, the police directorate of the statements that will leave the statements to leave Talat, some points of confidentiality decision was left without an explanation, he said.

Talat emphasized that it was a judiciary to say that it could not be “proved için for a file worked on the committees and that the committee cannot be the authority to undertake the court.

Talat stated that the statement on the report on the “request of the Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office is based on political reasons,” said that the committee was obliged to prove any crime by saying ‘proved’ with a very coercive report.

Talat, the CTP deputies of the conscience with the committee is comfortable, but the parliament should give the right messages to the society, he said.

Ongun Talat, immunity removed, said the issue should be advanced, he said.

-Lolian

CTP deputy product SOLYALI, this issue should be considered based on principles, not the name, noting that UBP’nin a group of decisions, “this issue has built a political wall,” he argued.

Solyalı claimed that this decision was made by UBP and that the committee members prepared a cover, “Under the decision of UBP has the signature of the UBP.”

Previously Aytaç Çaluda and Hüseyin Özgürgün’s immunity was not removed on the evaluation of the Constitutional Court on the evaluation of the Files, the Solası, the committee was concluded that the committee was authorized to decide whether it was a serious “ISTAD”.

Solayalı, by taking the diploma of Yeşilırmak, is concrete, so whether the criminal element should decide whether the court should decide.

The Committee did not have the right to say that they are guilty, they do not accuse them as CTP members, but they want to investigate a subject that they see can be investigated Solayan, “the committee decided to remove immunity, the process of trial of Yeşilırmak just like every citizen.

-Alikli

Public Works and Transportation Minister Erhan Arikli criticized that an impression that a immunity was rejected in the parliament for the first time, reminding that only 4 votes have been accepted so far about the abolition of immunity. ARIKLI, the prosecutor’s office is not correct, he said.

UBP deputy Aytaç Çaluda, who has been voted for immunity in the past, has been assassinated by the reputation, Arıklı, gave information about the immunity process of Çaluda.

Yeşilırmak’ın diploma to receive a timed out of the relevant case can be seen when the end of the deputy indicating that Arikli, people should not be so easy to damage the reputation of people, he said.

-The essential

CTP deputy Sami Özuslu, immunity to remove the demand for the removal of 11 people from the government and voted together, recalling the causes and results of other voting gave information.

Özuslu argued that there is such a thing as a public conscience and that the perception of ün bend and bend as much as you want, it is privileged ”will not change. Özuslu called Yeşilırmak to “relieve the public with your part and a party.

-It

CTP deputy Erkut Şahali, the issue is a subject that makes a shadow on the whole higher education because of a very large audience under suspicion, he said.

Şahali, who wants to end the reputation erosion of politics, said, “It is beaten in the iron pan,” he said that the trial of Yeşilırmak will not make sense after the deputy, and that the issue should be solved today.

Reminding that a series of people close to a number of governments related to the university in question, Şahali said that Yeşilırmak was not tried and attracted both suspicions and gave up his right to justify.

Şahali, said that the reputation lost in the field of higher education causes economically rapid blood loss, “I believe that all MPs have to keep him white and pure.

Stating that the issue is currently damaging everyone, Şahali reminded that the issue has reached a position that has a direct impact on politics.

-Hasipoğlu

UBP Pier Deputy Emrah Yeşilırmak, who took the last word, evaluating the request to remove the immunity of the special committee Chairman of the Special Committee Oguzhan Hasipoğlu, Yeşilırmak’s immunity to the committee of 4 meetings were held and the parties reportedly presented a report. Hasipoğlu stressed that the file is not examined by anyone except for the police and committee members.

Hasipoğlu stated that the parliament could not prevent the trial, that the decision taken is only a step that will cause postponement, and that there is no one who was tried on this issue.

Hasipoglu, Yeşilırmak’ın which declared the crime they could not determine and anyone who came to the committee could not answer this question, he said.

Yeşilırmak’s exemption and adjustment procedures are done by the authorized people and the decision -making is the university Hasipoğlu said, “Emrah Bey does not work for this diploma to commit a crime, there is no document. Because of this, our conscience is comfortable,” he said.

Hasipoğlu said that they have a perspective, not to be a trial, not to be a trial.

The opinion of the prosecution is not the word of Allah, but they did not remove the opinion, stood in place Hasipoğlu said that they do not have such authority by stating that the decision to be postponed only, he said.