Based on this information, write a new short title in English: “The ECtHR confirmed once again that the immovable property commission is an effective domestic way to be consumed” – BRTK

The Presidency evaluated the decision of the European Court of Human Rights.

The statement said, “The ECtHR has once again confirmed that the immovable property commission is an effective domestic way to be consumed”.

The statement made by the Presidency is as follows,
“The European Court of Human Rights has once again confirmed that the Mediterranean Tours Limited v. With the decision of Turkey, the immovable property commission (Greek Cypriot Greek Cypriots should be consumed in terms of the allegations of immovable property they have left in the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus.

The Court underlined that the refund of the goods in relation to the immovable property left by Greek Cypriots in the TRNC is not the only remedy, and that the compensation or clearing decisions that TMK may submit is a valid method of compensation as a valid method of refund. The ECtHR also clarified that the association of the Greeks with the immovables claimed by the Greek Courts will not cause a conflict of interest.

In the process of the immovable property subject to the application in the closed Maraş, TMK found its decision that made the Foundations Administration in accordance with the principle of fair trial.

Pointing to the progress made by TMK based on its recent statistics, the ECtHR also added that it was beneficial to maintain positive developments in a stable maintenance. In terms of application to the decision, some delays in the process in front of the TMK in the process of the ECtHR recorded that the ECtHR has been beneficial for the timely participation of the TRNC authorities to the processes in TMK and in the production of late trial, and in terms of this application, the European Human Rights Convention was given to the European Human Rights Convention.

This decision of the ECtHR is an answer to the Greek side of aggressive politics against our citizens by ignoring our property regime and TMK, which is an integral part of it. TMK has and maintains its effectively. The first and only address to apply for the demands of the Greek Cypriots who abandoned the immovable property in 1974 is TMK.

We once again remind the Greek side of his obligation to comply with the ECtHR decisions. We demand that the oppressive and hostile attitude that targets our citizens acting within the framework of our property regime, which the ECHR found appropriate, directed to punish individually and explicitly violates human rights. We emphasize that such practices are incompatible with international law and have serious consequences. ”