Consequences of Value-Based Politics Failure in Central Asia
The erosion of value-based politics has been a defining trend in global transformations of 2024, significantly impacting international relations. The rise of middle powers, the conservative wave in Europe, and Donald Trump’s electoral success in the United States all point to a growing skepticism towards policies and alliances based on shared values.
For decades, Western nations have centered their foreign policy on democratic values, human rights, and the rule of law. However, the shifting global landscape has seen emerging powers prioritize pragmatism over values, focusing on tangible economic and security benefits instead. This shift has highlighted the limitations of value-driven policy in a multipolar world.
While democratic and liberal values have undeniable benefits, attempts to impose them universally often lead to pushback and resentment. The resurgence of conservatism in Europe and the preference for transactional politics over ideological alignment underscore the appeal of pragmatic approaches that prioritize national interests.
Value-based politics faces challenges in adapting to regional complexities, leading to inconsistent applications and perceptions of double standards. This has deepened societal and political divisions, contributing to a polarized and adversarial climate. The decline of value-based politics calls for a recalibrated approach that acknowledges diverse societal contexts and the risks of overreach.
Central Asia offers a unique perspective on the shift towards pragmatic politics, with its leaders prioritizing stability, sovereignty, and economic development over ideological alignment. The region’s growing partnerships with major powers like China and Russia highlight the benefits of concrete outcomes and mutual cooperation.
The region’s strategic pragmatism aligns with the decline of value-based policies and emphasizes the need for a nuanced approach that balances pragmatism with shared principles. Western nations must recalibrate their engagement strategies by integrating principles into pragmatic frameworks that align with partner states’ priorities.
By embracing pragmatic, interest-driven policies, Central Asia can deepen relations with Western nations and major regional powers without compromising its multivector policy. This approach ensures the region’s development while maintaining geopolitical equilibrium and mitigating external exploitation.
Overall, the shift towards pragmatic politics in Central Asia reflects a broader trend away from value-based approaches in the international arena. Balancing pragmatism with shared principles is essential for long-term resilience and sustainable development in a multipolar world.
