Özersay Extols Secularism as the Bedrock of Modernity and Freedom
Kudret Özersay, the Chairman of the People’s Party (HP), has criticized the characterization of secularism practices in the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC) as oppression by the President of Diyanet-Sen. Özersay emphasized that secularism is not oppression, but rather a pillar of civilization and the safeguard of all freedoms, including freedom of religion and conscience.
In his statement, Özersay acknowledged the right of individuals to teach their children their religion, beliefs, and worship. However, he pointed out that such educational activities should be conducted with the permission and supervision of the Ministry of Education, as guaranteed by the country’s Constitution. He stressed that the Turkish Cypriot people’s sensitivity towards secularism should not be deemed as irreligious but rather as a reflection of their unique identity and the struggle for their rights with the support of Turkey. This achievement has been possible by embracing secularism and contemporary values.
Özersay also called upon the TRNC Ministry of National Education to share with the public the criteria for allowing religious education courses and how it monitors the implementation of these courses in accordance with the granted permissions. He questioned whether the permissions consider the age of the children, the type of education provided, and other relevant conditions. Özersay emphasized the importance of qualified individuals conducting these courses, who possess an understanding of pedagogy, child psychology, and the language of education. He urged the Ministry of Education to inform the public about these matters, highlighting the justifiable sensitivity of the Turkish Cypriot people.
Furthermore, Özersay highlighted that a previous decision by the TRNC courts was misrepresented to the Turkish public, attempting to poison the relations between the two countries. He clarified that the courts’ decision outlined the framework for conducting these courses, protecting the right to religious education and individuals’ learning of their religion. The court emphasized that since religious education is an educational activity, it should not be solely left to the Religious Affairs Department or conducted at one’s own will. The Ministry of Education should examine and supervise the courses based on pedagogical rules, granting permission only to those who fulfill the necessary conditions.
Özersay concluded by stating that if religious courses are organized for young children in settlements, they should be allowed and supervised by the Ministry of Education. He emphasized the importance of transparency and adherence to regulations in order to address the concerns of the Turkish Cypriot people.
