Supreme Court Decides Ownership of Wedding Jewelry for Groom and Bride
The Supreme Court has made a significant ruling regarding the ownership of jewelry worn by men and women at weddings, putting an end to disputes that often arise after divorces.
In a recent decision by the Court of Cassation 2nd Civil Chamber, it was stated that “ORDERS WORN ON MEN BELONG TO MEN, AND ORDERS WORN ON WOMEN BELONG TO WOMEN.” This landmark ruling has reshaped the previous understanding that all jewelry belonged to women, regardless of who wore it.
According to lawyer Buket Nurşah Tekışık, the new case law now dictates that the ownership of jewelry should be determined based on agreements between parties or, in the absence of an agreement, by considering customs and traditions. If the jewelry is specific to a certain gender, it should be deemed as belonging to that gender. Expert examinations may be conducted in cases of uncertainty.
In modern weddings, instead of wearing the jewelry individually, it is now common for them to be collected in a shared purse or container. In such cases, a decision must be made based on gender-specific qualities of the jewelry. If no such distinctions are present, the item will be considered common property.
Overall, this new ruling by the Supreme Court aims to provide clarity and fairness in cases of jewelry disputes, ensuring that each individual receives what rightfully belongs to them.
