Kyrgyzstan’s Ban on Islamic Niqab Sparks Concerns of Women’s Alienation
Kyrgyzstan Bans Islamic Niqab in Public Places
Kyrgyzstan has joined other countries in Muslim-majority Central Asia by banning the Islamic niqab, a garment that covers the body, hair, and face, except for the eyes. The ban, which took effect on February 1, imposes a fine of 20,000 som ($230) on women who wear the niqab in public places.
Government campaigns and public debates in Central Asia have long focused on female Islamic clothing and men’s beards, as secular governments in the region are concerned about the growing influence of Islam. Kyrgyz lawmakers have cited security reasons for the ban, stating that people’s faces need to be visible for identification purposes. However, opponents argue that the ban infringes on women’s freedom to choose their attire.
The amendment to the Religious Sphere Act, signed into law by President Sadyr Japarov on January 21, does not explicitly mention the niqab but prohibits clothing that hinders identification in government offices and public places. The ban does not extend to the hijab, an Islamic head scarf that leaves the face visible.
While the niqab is not traditionally worn in Kyrgyzstan, it has gained popularity among some conservative women in recent years. The ban has sparked intense debate in the country, with some supporting the government’s decision while others argue that it will isolate women who wear the niqab.
Central Asian countries like Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan have also implemented restrictions on Islamic attire, citing security concerns and the preservation of traditional values. The clampdowns on outward signs of Islam often involve banning the hijab in schools, offices, and government buildings, as well as enforcing specific national attire for women.
Despite the ban on the niqab, Kyrgyzstan remains one of the few countries in the region that allows the hijab in schools and offices. The debate over Islamic attire continues to be a contentious issue in Central Asia, with authorities balancing security concerns with religious freedom.
