PACE’s ruling on closed Maraş – Breaking News from Milliyet
The recent decision regarding the status of Maraş has sparked controversy and debate regarding the Cyprus issue. The decision, which suggests that opening Maraş and changing its status would violate UNSC decisions and hinder the chance for a comprehensive solution, has called for all parties to contribute to the political solution process on the island.
Furthermore, the decision criticized Ankara and the Turkish Cypriot side’s policy of a “two-state solution” in Cyprus, stating that it does not align with the UN’s parameters for a bi-regional and bi-communal federation. The call was also made to expedite the functioning of the Immovable Property Commission (TMK) in order to address property-related issues.
In response to this decision, Turkish parliamentarians Tuğrul Türkeş, Namık Tan, Sena Nur Çelik Kanat, and Konur Alp Koçak from the PACE Political Affairs and Democracy Commission presented an opposing opinion. They emphasized the historical context of Cyprus before 1974 and highlighted the difficulties faced by Turkish Cypriots from 1963 to 1974.
The document asserted that the international community must ensure the rights of the Turkish Cypriot people to sovereign equality and international status. It also stated that the concept of a bi-zonal and bi-communal federation had been exhausted following the failed negotiations in Crans Montana in 2017.
As discussions continue on the future of Cyprus, it is evident that differing perspectives and narratives surrounding the issue will play a crucial role in shaping the path towards a resolution.
