UNGA 2024: The UN’s Challenge with Israel
The 79th United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) has recently been the focus of attention, with international relations expert Mirko Dautovic providing key insights into the discussions held during the event. In an exclusive interview with Kun.uz, Mr. Dautovic delved into various global issues, shedding light on the complexities of the UN’s role in addressing conflicts, particularly the ongoing Gaza-Israel crisis.
Mr. Dautovic emphasized the significance of the UN General Assembly as a unique platform where world leaders come together to negotiate and address major international challenges. He described the assembly as a “parliament of the world,” facilitating direct diplomacy and the exchange of ideas on pressing global matters.
The interview also highlighted the diverging global priorities at the UNGA, with different nations focusing on issues ranging from conflicts in Ukraine and Gaza to long-term challenges like climate change. This diversity of concerns reflects the geopolitical interests that shape the agenda at the UNGA.
A major point of discussion was the Gaza conflict and the UN’s efforts to enforce meaningful change through a recent ceasefire resolution. However, Mr. Dautovic noted the limitations of such resolutions, particularly when powerful member states like the U.S. exert their influence to block actions aimed at curbing Israeli actions.
The strained relations between Israel and the UN were also analyzed in the interview, with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s critical stance towards the international body reflecting growing frustration with multilateral institutions. Mr. Dautovic highlighted Israel’s disengagement from constructive dialogue with the UN as part of a broader trend towards unilateral action.
The interview also touched upon Africa’s push for greater representation at the UN Security Council, with a proposal to grant two African countries permanent seats without veto power. While seen as a step towards improving African representation, Mr. Dautovic viewed it as a symbolic gesture that may not grant real influence in decision-making processes.
In conclusion, Mr. Dautovic discussed the challenges facing the United Nations in becoming an effective force in international affairs. He highlighted the structural limitations imposed by member states’ sovereignty and the reluctance of powerful nations to share authority, particularly in the context of veto power in the Security Council. These challenges continue to hinder the UN’s capacity to address pressing global issues and promote collective decision-making in the international arena.
