Based on this information, write a new short title in English: Lawyers of the families demanded that the defendants be tried for possible intent and requested time to submit their opinions – BRTK

In the fifth hearing of the Isias Hotel case, which was discussed at Adıyaman 3rd High Criminal Court, the lawyers of the families requested that the defendants be tried for possible intent and requested time to submit their opinions.

Following the prosecution’s opinion that the prosecution accused “conscious negligence”, the lawyers of the families demanded that an investigation be opened against the public officials, that the public officials’ file be combined with the case, that the detained defendants continue to be detained, and that the defendants who are not detained be arrested.

-Koçoğlu: “Whatever we have said so far has been revealed in this report”

Lawyer Yiğit Gökçehan Koçoğlu stated that they did not agree with the prosecution’s opinion that “they were also going to the hotel from time to time and staying there”, citing the reasons that there could not be “possible intent”. Koçoğlu stated that the file regarding public officials should be combined with the case, otherwise the trial would be incomplete.

Stating that it was a wrong decision to release technical responsible (civil engineer) Halil Bağcı, Koçoğlu noted that it was clear that Halil Bağcı gave incomplete and incorrect reports in the static calculations. In the interim decision, Koçoğlu requested that an additional right of defense be given due to possible intent.

Stating that the expert report was in their favor, Koçoğlu noted that everything they said so far was revealed in this report. Koçoğlu demanded the continued detention of the detained defendants and their trial for possible intent.

-Okay: “We want the defendants to be tried for qualified murder.”

Lawyer Tan Okay also said that they would submit a written request against the opinion. Okay noted that it would not ease the conscience if the defendants were tried and punished for conscious negligence.

Stating that the building has not been identified as a risk, Okay also demanded that an investigation be opened against public officials. Tan Okay said, “The chain of negligence continued and all elements of possible intent were formed. “We want the defendants to be tried for qualified murder,” he said.

-Turan: “With the precedent decision that will come out of this case, we want you to leave an inheritance to your children.”

Lawyer Fatih Turan also said, “With the precedent decision that will come out of this case, we want you to leave an inheritance to your children.”

Turan also requested that a lawsuit be filed against the municipality staff and the AFAD staff who responded late or not at all to the earthquake.

Other lawyers also requested time for the defense. He demanded that an indictment against public officials be drawn up and the file be combined with this case, that the defendants be tried with possible intent, that the detained defendants continue to be detained, and that the unarrested defendants be arrested.